Six Steps to Completing an Effective
Job Safety Analysis
As an Health Safety and Environment practitioner protecting to employees lives and property within the organization
is utmost priority, to achieve above aim it is very essential to identify
associated hazards in each stage of task to mitigate inherent risk during work
activity, missing to identify any of hazard in activity might be impose danger
on employees lives and property of organization.
What are the Hazard Identification Methods?
There are various
methods that might be used to identify hazards in a workplace as part of a risk assessment process:
1. Inspections
2. Task analysis
3. Legislation
4. Manufacturer’s Information
5. Incident data
3. Legislation
4. Manufacturer’s Information
5. Incident data
To identify
associated hazards effectively in particular task, comprehensive techniques and
group of different people required to accomplish Job Safety Analysis without
missing hazard from the task.
What is Job Safety Analysis?
A job safety analysis (JSA) is a procedure which helps integrate accepted safety and health
principles and practices into a particular task or job operation.
Job safety analysis is task
based analysis to identify hazards into particular task or job operation.
For Example:
Manual
Handling Task
A group of people who are working in warehouse has to lift an object from one area to designated place.
Why Job Safety Analysis need to be carryout?
As per OSHA and other
legislation recommendation, it is responsibility of employer to develop a
written document of Safe system of work such as safe work practices or standard
work procedure for particular task and operations which are being conducted
within the organization. To identify hazards in each particular task Job safety
analysis is essential to carryout for developing safe system of work.
How to select team to conduct Job Safety Analysis?
Selection of Team |
Preparation of Job Safety Analysis is not
liability of single person, oftentimes in many of organizations it is
misinterpreted or due to negative HSE culture only HSE personnel or department
are liable to carryout Job Safety Analysis, but this method is completely
wrong, because it might be possible that HSE personnel are not practically
sound comparatively to technical team to identify hazards in particular
activity.
To conduct a Job Safety Analysis effectively it is
important to select team wisely, Job Safety Analysis team must have minimum
following personnel but not limited to conduct JSA effectively,
1. HSE personnel
1. HSE personnel
2. Technical team member i.e. Engineer, Supervisor
3. Maintenance team member
4. Representative member from employees
5. Operator of particular task
Each of above members must have to contribute their expertise to
identify hazards in particular activity. It is important to accept every
opinion from each members.
How to identify affected group of people in particular task prior to commence JSA?
Prior to start Job Safety Analysis for a particular task,
selected team has to identify which people are exposed and who are affected for
particular task, for example Operator, Helpers, Supervisors and surrounding
working people, also consider the suppliers and visitors if they are involved
or part of in activity in particular task.
The outcomes of this
exercise is to identify lone working people, vulnerable people such as pregnant
women, young or aged people etc., conclusion for special requirement such as
extra vigilance, additional emergency lifesaving equipment, health checkups
etc.How to commence Job Safety Analysis step by step?
Job Safety Analysis Step by Step |
Job
Safety Analysis can be conducted effectively in six steps, there is a useful acronym for task based Safety analysis -
SREDIM:
2. Record the steps or stages of the task.
3. Evaluate the risks associated with each step.
4. Develop the safe working method.
5. Implement the safe working method.
6. Monitor to ensure it is effective.
1. Select the Task.
To commence Job Safety
Analysis first step is select the task which is being performed within the
organization.
Let’s take previous Example:
Manual handling in
warehouse.
Task is being conducted by
helpers to lift an object from one place to keep at their designated place.
2. Record the steps or stages of the task.
In second step break selected
task in to defined sequence of individual steps or stages to identify hazards
in each steps of task without omitted anyone.
It’s important to
avoid defining individual job tasks too narrowly or too broadly. Generally
speaking, a job should contain no more than ten individual tasks. If your JSA
exceeds this number, consider separating the job into two or more separate
phases.For example:
1. Prior to Manual lifting
2. During the manual lifting
3. After Manual handling
3. Evaluate the risks associated with each step.
In third step hazards should
be identified after the observation and break down of each stage of selected
task.
A number of questions should
be asked in each stage to assess the potential hazards in performing individual
job tasks. Proceed through the sequence of job tasks one at a time and answer
questions such as:
Prior to Manual lifting
1. Location
from where an object need to be lifted.
2. Load
of Object.
3. State
of material, i.e. Solid, Liquid or Gases.
4. Are
there any pinch points?
5. Capacity
of person.
6. Capacity
of container.
7. Shape
and Condition of object i.e. Sharp, Hot etc.
8. Grip
in object.
9. Travel
distance i.e. is designated location near or far away?
10. Location
at where an object being to be kept.
During the Manual lifting
1. Engaged
employee awareness for manual lifting. I.e. lifting techniques, holding
position etc.
2. Any
obstruction in pathway.
3. Condition
of floor i.e. slippery, uneven etc.
4. Condition
of foot wear.
5. Interference
by vicinity activity. I.e. Vehicle movement, hot work etc.
After Manual handling
1. Placing
of object at designated place.
2. Load
bearing capacity of rack.
3.Fastening to object.
4. Develop the safe working method.
In fourth step control measures of each hazards should be
develop to mitigate risk in particular task.
The hierarchy of control which is common tool to be used
broadly to develop control or preventive measures for each identified hazards.
The hierarchy of control are separated in five sections, in order of effectiveness, with the following
description:Hazard control hierarchy |
Elimination –
Physically remove the hazard
Substitution –
Replace the hazard
Engineering controls –
Isolate people from the hazard.
Administration controls –
Change the way people work.
PPE –
Protect the worker with personal protective equipment.
Hazard elimination and substitution broadly considered to be the most effective solution to improve safety.
Note: It is
important to consider property damage and environmental impact and not just personal
injury.
Wherever possible, control measures higher in the hierarchy
should be used, providing they are reasonably practicable, and emphasis should
be placed upon control at source.
A combination of measures will usually be necessary in order to reduce the level of Risk as Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). It should also be considered that when specifying controls, any associated risk that they bring with them needs to be assessed and controlled.
A combination of measures will usually be necessary in order to reduce the level of Risk as Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). It should also be considered that when specifying controls, any associated risk that they bring with them needs to be assessed and controlled.
Typical Control Measures can be placed in the following
categories:
Control Measure
|
Typical Examples
|
1.
Physical
|
>Removal of fuses; Insert spade or blank flange in pipe work;
>Lock off valve;
>Erect mechanical barrier; Use locked enclosure
>Keep people at a distance (e.g., signs, warning tape);
>Eliminate or substitute toxic substances;
>Substitute noisy machinery;
>Use mechanical handling equipment.
|
2. Procedural
|
>Test for pressure build-up or leaks;
>Examination of flushing fluid;
>Test for hazardous chemicals in liquid, solid or
gaseous form;
>Procedure for control of simultaneous or adjacent work;
>Prohibition of hot work;
>Equipment lock-out;
>Develop contingency plan,
|
3.
Human
|
>Use of independent specialist personnel;
>Regular or constant monitoring of the Task;
>Use of method statements / detailed procedures;
>Clear instructions and warnings to workforce;
>Clear definitions of roles and responsibilities during
the task;
>Adequate supervision;
>Ensure competency of personnel for the activity
|
4.
Time
|
>Limit duration of the Task or time of day when the
activity occurs;
>Use time-saving measures such as hot-bolting, good work site preparation and planning for the movement of materials, tools. |
5a. Contingency
(Control)
|
>Emergency shutdown, deluge and blow-down systems,
reduction of inventory.
|
5b. Contingency
(Mitigation)
|
>Emergency response system, fire/blast wall, water
curtain, provision of PPE, rescue equipment, etc.
|
Once the hazards and control measures have been identified, each
should be allocated to either an individual or a role, all the findings and
individuals’ responsibilities should be documented and Safe working method
should be developed. Prepared safe working method should be reviewed and
approved by concern folks prior to dissemination among employees.
5. Implement the safe working method.
After
Job Safety Analysis has been completed and safe working method has been
developed, the document should be made available with engaged employees or
exposed people with particular task.
Safe
working method should be discussed among all engaged people in “Tool Box Talk” prior
to commence activity. Also, explored preventive control measures should be adhered
during entire activity to mitigate risk.
Also,
it is necessary that adequate resources should be provided to work force to embrace
and implement safe working method effectively within the organization.
6. Monitor to ensure it is effective.
After completion of Job
Safety Analysis, monitoring of safe working method should be carried out by
various manner to assess effectiveness of developed safe working method.
Regularly reviewing of
leading and legging key performance indicators KPI’s such as Safe man-hours,
numbers of observations, Injury frequency rate, numbers of incidents etc. is
one of the essential tool to monitor effectiveness of developed safe working
method or Job Safety Analysis.
If a workplace injury occurs, a review of the relevant JSA should occur
to see if it had a shortcoming that may have contributed to the incident. A good
practice is to involve workforce in a periodic review exercise for existing
JSAs to make sure they still accurately capture the job tasks as performed today and address all
associated risks.
Flow chart to prepare JSA |
If you are seeking
further details on the above subject, kindly comment below or contact with us.
Also, provide your feedback on above article to encourage us.
Also, provide your feedback on above article to encourage us.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please do not enter any spam link in the comment box.